Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Devon takes a look at a used Jeep

Photo provided by Raul 

Likes: Affordable prices, flexible range of engines. Good off-road capaibilities.

Dislikes: Ride comfort on road is poor. Never feels settled or composed on-road. Cabin materials are cheap and iffy in terms of quality.

What's it like to drive? The Grand Cherokee has good off-road abilities thanks to it's excellent drive height and grippy four-wheel-drive. It's not bad on road either thanks to light steering which helps make the Grand Cherokee feel more easy to manuever around town.

Interior wise the Grand Cherokee falls short of its rivals. For such a large vehicle, the interior struggles to fit up to five passengers. Fit in finish of the cabin materials feel iffy. Switchgear in the cabin are known for giving problems to owners, we suggest making sure all works before buying. Headroom and legroom are okay but rather tight for taller passengers. One of the biggest complaints I have with the Cherokee is the uncomfortable rear seat. It often feels like there isn't enough cushion and you're sitting upright at all times. The boot space is a decent size, but there's a high lip which means you'll have to lift heavier objects when loading.

Which should I buy?
3.7L 210hp (2005 - 2010) Laredo, Limted
4.7L 265hp (2005 - 2007) Laredo, Limited: 305hp (2008 - 2009) Laredo, Limited
5.7L 330hp (2005 - 2008) Limited, Overland: 357hp (2009 - 2010) Laredo, Limited, Overland
6.1L 425hp (2006 - 2010) SRT-8
3-L 215hp turbo-diesel (2007 - 2008) Laredo, Limited, Overland

Depending upon which Grand Cherokee you are looking at and the model year you are choosing. If you are going to take your Grand Cherokee off-roading, we suggest picking one of the eight-cylinder engines which has more pull than the 3.7L which tends to fall short. The 6.2L trim is more aimed at on-road performance with the larger alloy wheels and firmer suspenison. There is a diesel engine option but will be harder to find due to the limited production run of that engine. The 3.7L engine only makes the most sense if you are going to drive on-road and never venture off-roading.

Running costs: The Grand Cherokee's strong points are its low prices and there are a few of them on the second hand market that are bargains. If fuel economy is a concern we suggest sticking with the 3.7L or hunting for the more frugal 3-liter turbo-diesel. The eight-cylinders have the most pull but aren't the must frugal. If you don't need the 4x4 then we suggest getting the 4x2 with the eight-cylinders to help increase fuel economy slightly.

What to look out four?

2005 - A recall was issued for models with the 3.7-liter V6 concerning possible contamination of the automatic transmission with water from the A/C condenser causing shuddering and possible failure of the torque converter.

2006 - A recall was issued for a possible defect in the driver's airbag inflator connector.

2006-07 - A recall was issued for possibly faulty programming of the anti-lock brakes that may cause a momentary delay in braking when coasting uphill.

2007 - A recall was issued for faulty anti-lock brake software that may cause the rear brakes to lock up under certain conditions.

2007-08 - A recall was issued for possible improperly manufactured front brake calipers that could fracture, thus interfering with the brakes ability to slow or stop the vehicle.

2008 - A recall was issued for a possible defective front control module that could result in stalling while driving.

2009 - A recall was issued for possible reversed wiring in the steering column control module driver airbag connector. In the event of a crash, the driver's airbag may not inflate.

2010 - Recalls were issued for a possible defective passenger side front airbag, possible defective brake booster input rod (could lead to brake failure), a possibly defective rear track bar, and defective ignition module that may allow the key to be removed before the vehicle is placed in park.

Devon M


Dan P

  • TWO’S A COMPANY, THREE’S A—WHOOPS, WRONG TV SHOW: What to do with Milwaukee’s now overcrowded backcourt.
The Milwaukee Bucks, to their credit were the talk of the NBA trade deadline and not only were they the closest to landing veteran forward Josh Smith, but they did pull off a trade for coveted guard J.J. Redick.  Much to my chagrin, they accomplished this without giving up a draft pick and also stole little-known center, Gustavo Ayon: a player who has excelled in small minutes with the New Orleans Hornets and Orlando Magic, previously.  The addition of Redick will bring reliable 3-point shooting and, surprisingly, some size at the guard position as the existing backcourt of Monta Ellis and Brandon Jennings are both speedy, yet smaller than Redick. 

One cannot even begin to comprehend how much of an improvement Redick is at 3-point shooting than Monta Ellis.  The aforementioned, speedy guard is shooting a capricious 22.7% (42 of 185) from downtown and, yes, that’s not a misprint.  It doesn’t take a math genius to know that Ellis averages worse than 1 for 4 from 3-point land, in every game this season.  No wonder Scott Skiles lost his marbles and wanted out of Milwaukee!  Brandon Jennings, who also shoots a meager 40% from the field, like Ellis, at least connects from downtown at a clip of 37% which is slightly above league average.  Don’t get me wrong, I find Monta Ellis intriguing but he strikes me as the guy that everyone wants on their team but isn’t sure how he fits into a system that isn’t built solely around him (Tyreke Evans fits that description too). 

Here’s the last 5 years of Bucks’ regular season record:  

Bucks Regular Season Records

Other than the almost .500 finish in a shortened-season last year, they have only topped 40 wins once in the last five years and counting this year’s as well, if their record holds at the same rate.  Somehow, Coach Jim Boylan will have to balance his three guards to maximize their potential, keep Redick’s minutes up (he was averaging 30 in Orlando), and find out which two guards the Bucks’ brass will have to keep for next year.  Redick and Jennings current contracts will end after this year and Monta has one more year going into 2014.  One strategy would be to ultimately decide that Jennings and Redick are the future and make a more balanced combination than any of the two with Ellis (Kind of like Klay Thompson and Stephen Curry?—Ed).  I tend to like this idea because there seems to be redundancy skill wise between Ellis and Jennings and furthermore, Monta’s expiring contract in 2014 of $11 million is very attractive to any team who can afford it.  Only time will tell but I can hardly see a future where the Bucks keep all three.      

For as bad as Dwight Howard has looked this year, the L.A. Lakers still crushed that deal.  Ok fine, he’s been “bad” Dwight Howard compared to Dwight Howard “standards” (still averages 16.5pts/12reb/2.5blks).  But at least we still have something to compare against his more dominant years and we can still find reason to argue where he will play next year.  The operative word is where, not if or when

Andrew Bynum, on the other hand, is a mystery as to when he will play this year or if teams think he’s worth the trouble anymore.  His best, on-the-court skill these days is finding those ridiculous suits for 7-foot centers and, of course, growing an immaculate afro.  Seriously, do a quick search on this topic.  

Let’s look at the raw numbers: Andrew Bynum was a Laker for 7 years and played in 392 out of 554 possible games to a tune of just under 71%.  Add in his 0/54 this season with the Philadelphia 76ers and this yields  392/608, or 64% of all possible games he could have participated.  That is some seriously scary stuff for a guy who doesn’t turn 26 until October 27th of this year.  I just don't see Bynum playing in that many games this year and if I were his agent, I would advise against him playing.  The worst thing Bynum could do is either come back too early and re-injure his knees or come back and not be all that productive trying to re- acclimate himself in a hostile, environment that is the Philadelphia, sports scene.  Might as well keep teams dreaming of what he can be when he's healthy and move on from a tainted situation.  

I was recently asked a question that has come up repeatedly over the years: why do the San Antonio Spurs get so little attention and why are they considered "boring"?  

At first I resisted the offer to resort to that question because every true basketball junkie knows about this team and has become accustomed to.  The Spurs are great, they have been great for a long time, and they have one of the most underrated coaches ever in Gregg Popovich.  They have won enough recent titles so I don't feel obligated to feel sorry for them.  So I put it to the side and left it alone trying to concentrate on All-Star weekend.  

Upon resuming the regular season I wanted to take a glance at the standings and see the general landscape of how the playoff schedule might shake out.  And that's when it happened and I began to track the next week or so.  The Spurs as of February 26th are sitting at 45-13.  How is this possible?  Even for Spurs’ standards, that’s quite an impressive record for their aging “Big Three.”  So it must be the defense, right?  Well, yes, they are the 9th stingiest defense in the league giving up 95.8 points per game.  However, they’re really doing it on the offensive end as well, producing 104.3 points per game the (4th) best in the league!  The Spurs (+8.4) trail only the Thunder (+9.1) in point differential and, yes, that means they are ahead of the vaunted Miami Heat (+7.1).  

It is simply incredible given Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili, and Tony Parker are 36, 35, and 30 years-old, respectively.  There's one shining rank statistically that may shed some light: the Spurs rank #1 in assists in the NBA at 25 per game (Tony Parker is the engine and Pop knows it!-Ed).  

So let’s take a look at the Spurs 5-man units and see what their best lineups are:

Top Five-Man Floor Units

What we can see in the top-three, 5-man units is the Spurs really have their main rotation rounded out and that on paper, the types of players they put out on the floor seem to set up a really nice amount of spacing.  For the record, I stopped after four units since these are the only four units that have play at least 100 minutes together.  Parker creates, Danny Green hangs out at the wings, Kawhi Leonard roams looking to set picks and rebound, Duncan has his butt on the blocks, and Tiago Splitter can play high and low for screens and post ups.  It's a really nice fit and even when they sit either Duncan or Splitter, they have Boris Diaw who has always been a big body who can pass and facilitate on offense.  One thing that seems impossible is that Manu Ginobli isn't on any of these lists, but at 23 minutes per game, he seems to really be playing the super 6th man so probably not surprising.  

So are the Spurs boring?  Well that's just a matter of opinion, but to me it's just great basketball. 

Tuesday, February 26, 2013


Bryce Harper had a heck of a 2012 season.

Felipe M

5. Trevor Bauer--SP--Cleveland Indians
  • 2012 Outlook: "Compared to Tim Lincecum.  Best of the D'backs' prospects."
  • 2012 Accomplishments: #3 in Pacific Coast League and the league's best pitcher.
  • Conclusion: Aside from a 4.2 BB/9, Bauer absolutely dominated in the Minors in 2012.  He did pitch for the Big League club, but was playing hurt in his time with the D'backs.  Unfortunately for Arizona, conflict between the young pitcher and the entire organization forced the D'backs to ship him to Cleveland for a bushel of balls, a 2-year supply of hot dogs, and a high volume of the freshest Lake Erie water.  People are going to get fired in Arizona because of this trade.  However, management wanted to get rid of this promising prospect, but the real "snake bite" come from the fact that they really didn't get fair value for this player and that's very unfortunate.  At least they were able to get solid players in the Justin Upton deal.  Currently, Bauer is competing for the #5 spot in the Indians' rotation.  
4. Julio Teheran--SP--Atlanta Braves
  • 2012 Outlook: "Compared to Pedro Martinez; best of the Braves' pitching prospects."
  • 2012 Accomplishments: #1 Prospect in Braves' organization and possesses Best Changeup in the system; #4 Prospect in International League. 
  • Conclusion: Struggled mightily in the Minors last season, but many pundits are blaming the organization for trying to change his delivery.  Reports out of spring training are that Teheran has returned to his old delivery and is pitching with extreme confidence.  He is currently competing for a rotation spot. 
3. Jesus Montero--C--Seattle Mariners
A young Jesus Montero readying himself with that lumber.
  • 2012 Outlook: "Will mainly DH for the Mariners.  Can hit for power and average."
  • 2012 Accomplishments: Played 135 games for the Mariners in 2012, but only 56 games at catcher.
  • Conclusion: One of the many players that were linked to the recent BioGenesis scandal adds to Montero's problems, mainly his defensive duties at the catching position and how will he exactly bounce back from a disastrous 2012 (.260/.298/.389 BB:K .29).  His last season at Triple-A shows what Montero is capable of: .289/.351/.493/.843 BB:K .43.  That potential has management salivating at things to come and opted to hand him the keys to the #1 catching spot as they got rid of any potential competition that might get in his way this season. 
2. Bryce Harper--OF--Washington Nationals
  • 2012 Outlook: "At 19, he's the best prospect in baseball.  Will get called up in 2012."
  • 2012 Accomplishments: NL ROOKIE OF THE YEAR and All-Star
  • Conclusion: Now 20, Harper is slated to start in LF for the Nationals.  What's very impressive about Harper is that not only did he succeed as a teengager in his first season in the Majors, but that he showed no indication that he was ready for the Big Leagues in the Minors.  He struggled in Double and Triple-A posting mediocre batting average, low on-base%, and displaying absolutely no power.  His patience at the plate did improve so there might have been hope for him in that aspect.  He put on more weight to endure a full season in the Majors and, obviously, to hit for more power and improve on his .817 OPS from last season.
It might be the worst ballpark,
but it will be home to a lot of
young, promising players.
1. Matt Moore--SP--Tampa Rays
  • 2012 Outlook: "Might be better than Stephen Strasburg."
  • 2012 Accomplishments: Pitched 177.1 innings for the Rays. 
  • Conclusion: After dominating and destroying everything in his path in Double and Triple-A, Moore's 2012 was sort of ordinary: WHIP 1.35; H/9 8.0; HR/9 0.9; BB/9 4.1; K/9 8.9.  He did find his rhythm in the 2nd half of the season so that's a good sign; that and his high strikeout rate.  Moore is very likely to break camp as the Rays' #3 starter.  

 More MLB content is available here

The rest of the prospects can be found here.

All pictures courtesy of Mike McCann's Field of Fotos.  

CATCH!: 2013 Early Pre-Rankings--3B

Will Longoria stay healthy this season?
(photo courtesy of Mike McCann's Field of Fotos)

Felipe M


1. Miguel Cabrera: MVP, Triple-Crown Winner: what more can be said?
2. Adrian Beltre: He will be 34 this year.  He can still rake, however. Should be good for another 30/100 season.
3. David Wright: Mr. Met is a solid player to have at this position.  He can even steal 15+ bases.  The difference between him and Beltre is that the latter has slightly better contact skills.
4. Evan Longoria: So young and full of talent.  If only he could stay healthy.  If he does stay healthy, you can expect a 30/100 season, .300 average, and a .935 OPS.
5. Ryan Zimmerman: Just like Longoria, Zimmerman is starting to get a reputation of being injury-proned.  However, when healthy, he can provide plenty of power and just enough contact on the ball to help with the batting average.


6. Aramis Ramirez: At 35, we know what we're getting in Ramirez.  He also has a reputation for being a slow-starter and/or a player who seems to produce the most when the pressure is off of him.  He can be very productive, nonetheless.
7. Chase Headley: Last year, around this time, many projected Headly to hit 10 homeruns,   SLG% .392, and an OPS of .742.  He ended up with 30 homers, SLG% .498, and produce an OPS of .875.  I don't think he'll go on that power surge again, but Petco is supposed to move in their fences.  He is also good for 15 stolen bases.  20/90 and .820 OPS is more realistic.
8. Brett Lawrie: A lot of publications have Lawrie in this slot, but be forewarned: he's still undergoing development.  A lot of the hype comes from his untapped potential and 20/20 projections, but he still is undisciplined at the plate and had a groundball rate of 51% in 2012.   He does provide solid contact skills, but needs to provide more power. 
9. Hanley Ramirez: We've mentioned how much of a headache Hanley can be on our SS list.  Depending on what you need, he can still be a 25/25 player, but provides relatively low on-base% and OPS.
10. Pablo Sandoval: The World Series MVP will be on high demand in most drafts this year.  However, there are some concerns with this "Panda": injuries, playing for the Giants and their massive ballpark, and his weight.  Despite those concerns, Sandoval is only 26 and ready to enter his prime years and has the ability to hist 25+ homers and provide massive OPS.  
11. Martin Prado: Probably the "safest" player on the list: he's versatile, garners lots of at bats, and has great patience at the plate, and superior contact skills.  He won't provide much power, but he does have on-base skills and can still be a 15/15 player.


The rest of the field:
Keep an eye on:

Saab Story Part One: The 9-5 of the range.

Saab never used to build cars for the conventional person. Most people who bought Saabs were very intelligent people and knew that they didn't want to fall into the cliches of BMW and Audi Drivers. This is why Saab still has the most loyal fan base of any company. Most people take pictures of their cars, people with Saabs take pictures with their cars.  This sense of pride made me wonder why do people love their Saabs so much? Why do people smile whenever they talk about their Saab? Is it true that once you test drive a Saab you buy one? 

Photo provided by Raul 
 This was the first 9-5 wagon which appeared in 1998. It was the most unique looking wagon I had ever seen during the time. The unique wrap around rear windscreen and the large yet roomy boot made this 9-5 a real alternative to the sport utility vehicle. This was in the era when having a wagon was still considered 'cool' before sport utility vehicles took over and slowly made the wagon look lame. I still have a special place in my heart for wagons and the 9-5 always managed to hit all the sweet spots for me. This version seen had a 3-liter asymmetrical low-pressure turbocharged six-cylinder engine.

This engine is good for about 200hp and is mated to a four-speed automatic transmission. It's not a fire cracker of an engine like you'd expect from Saab, but it was smooth and easy to drive around town and on the motorway. Once the turbo kicks in and you that's when the real joy comes into your heart. This turbo really does push you back in your seat. At some point I forgot I was even driving a wagon. The unique driving experience really does characterize the Saab well.

The interior was what I loved most about Saab, and the central console mounted ignition switch is just about the most awesome thing I've ever seen on a car. I wish other cars had this design. No one understands the benefits of not having to hear your rattling keys from a column based ignition switch. In Saab Eyes if you are in a front collision and the steering wheel is designed to deform away from the driver, the ignition switch will buckle down and intrude into the space where your legs are and potentially cause leg injury. Those Swedes thought of everything when it came to safety! This is why the ignition switch is in the center console away from the areas of the body will cause injury. Not to mention keep theft far - far away, as the trick of having a center console igniton switch is that you can directly lock the transmission. Which means that no one is geting anywhere with your Saab unless they have the key. Clever Saab! Clever!

Unlike most cars, Saab's Interiors have always reflected their Aircraft heritage. The 'Night Panel' function which alloys you to shut off all the instrumental lights that aren't needed to reduce eye strain. Everything within the dashboard is within easy reach of the hand. It's very driver focused, which helps you stay focused on what's most important and that's driving.

I started really paying attention to Saab when they started trying to compete with Audi and Mercedes-Benz. Even though we all knew that Saab's main rival was Volvo. The newest generation of the 9-5 was the one I have shown here. It wasn't really a next generation, more like a facelift and a few changes mechanically and interior wise. If you sat both cars side by side you won't really be able to spot out the difference. In this model year, the 9-5 switched to all four-cylinder engines. One thing that Saab should always stayed true to. Six-cylinders and eight-cylinders are okay but it doesn't have the magic of a turbo four.

Photo provided by Rual 

Something that Saab has always managed to put into their cars. This 9-5 I have here had a 2.3-liter light-pressure turbo engine which produced 185hp. Again, the engine is what won me over with this car, along with all the quirky nature of Saabness. The front seats were a dream to sit in and still remains one of the best I've ever sat in. The interior again is just like the previous 9-5 wagon I test drove, everything is focused towards the driver. It gives you this sense of safety and comfort. I didn't get that feeling from a BMW or Audi. The 9-5 is one of those cars you can just relax and drive smoothly. You know you have a turbo and when you put that turbo into gear it really does come through. In the Saab case it wasn't the turbo, it was the sheer driving exprience and that was what made the car brilliant. I loved how it felt even on the roughest surfaces. The 9-5 managed to feel much more comfortbale than the 5-series that I had test drove which basically had the firmest and roughest suspension I ever test drove on a car.

For the short amount of time that I had the 9-5 wagon, I immediately wanted to buy it right there. It's just an amazing vehicle and it really does put a smile on your face. Which brings me back to the first question that I asked, why do people smile when ever they talk about their Saabs. I sort of get why, but it's really hard to explain it. It's not the fact that you're paying less than a BMW or Audi. It certainly isn't the styling because it doesn't appeal to all. It's the way the car makes you feel when you are behind the wheel. It's a warm and fuzzy feeling, sort of like when you pet a fuzzy cat. It just grows on you and you'd never expect this type of emotion to occur in a car. This is why Saabs will be missed by their fans and those who choose to carry on the Saab Heritage.

Photo provided by Felipe Melecio 
The final facelift for the 9-5 range came around 2006 and it was probably my least favorite version of the 9-5. Well I said that only looking at the pictures. When I seen it in person that's when it quickly warmed on me fast. This 9-5 was refreshed and really did look just as good as when the first one rolled into the scene in 1997. Saab had addressed their complicated climate controls and used simple dials and of course they trimmed down the line-up to one engine and I'll have to say it was the best decision Saab made. This engine produced 260hp from a tiny 2.3-liter four-cylinder engine.

There was a five-speed manual gearbox and a six-speed automatic gearbox. I never had the chance to personally test drive the 9-5 with the five-speed manual gearbox like I did in the 9-3 Viggen. The six-speed automatic was smooth and worked well with the turbo engine. This version shown above was in Aero Trim which of course had the nicer alloy wheels and firmer suspension. Xenon headlamps and a really nicely trimmed leather upholstry. The electric sunshine roof is a welcome add, even though I thought it kind of ate into headroom a little bit. (I don't know why I felt like complaining about headroom. Clearly I'm short and headroom will never be an issue for me.) Moving on. This version of the 9-5 was probably one of the best I've driven compared to the wagon I previously mentioned. It felt more grown up and more sophisticated which I liked a lot. Saab had retuned the suspension so it didn't feel like it was going to run out of grip in the middle of a turn or the ESP had to step in to keep the front wheels from torque steering it's rubber off. (This only occured in the Aero form which of course had the most powerful turbo engine.)

I could talk about the driving impressions all day when it comes to Saab. It really doesn't feel like any other car on the road and I really do like that feeling. It's a great car and it really does what it is aimed to do and does it well. Most people say that it's expensive and the interior is old. In my opinion the interior isn't old, it's a retro throwback to the former quirky days. Also the fact that the 9-5 is way safer than a BMW and Audi shows you where you put your money. If I were to buy this and give it to my kid, I'd know they would be safe and can walk away from a crash. These vehicles are built like tanks and will withstand anything! (Well not literally anything but you get the point.) I only had this 9-5 for a short amount of time and again I wished that I could just buy it right then and there. It's the unique attention to detail and of course the ever exaggerated driving experience that really helps make the Saab unique and I loved it.

Photo provided by Raul 
Sadly the last of the 9-5 ends here. Saab was purchased by Spyker who thought they could save the company from bankruptcy, but then again for a super car company that doesn't know much about mainstream vehicles, this purchase was really a bad one. Saab has always been the company that did things differently and never mainstream compared to rivals, even though with this generation of the 9-5 they ditched the center console power window switches. The center console ignition switch still remained but was replaced by a push button start system. I'm not a huge fan of this technology as it seems rather gimmicky.

This 9-5 had a 2-liter turbo four-cylinder with 220hp and a 2.8-liter twin-turbocharged six-cylinder with 300hp. I was able to test drive both and thought the 2-liter turbo four was the most entertaining to drive. It helped make the 9-5 light on its feet and feel way more driver focused than the six-cylinder which just felt heavy and boring to drive. Even with 300hp it didn't feel like the Saab I grew to love in the past. It really did change to the point where it made me rather sad and disappointed. The interior lay out was still there and the driver focused details were there, just the sheer driving experience was lost. Saab tried too hard to compete in a segment it wasn't really destined to compete with. Saab is a niche brand and appeals to those who don't want a conventional Audi or BMW. The unique styling is there and I applaud Saab for staying true to their unique designs, just the overall impression was rather disappointing, I think Saab could've done a way better job but it felt rushed and unready.

Saab will always have a special place in my heart. I understand why people stand by their cars even if the company no longer builds cars. Saab has that special something words can't describe. It's fun to drive, the engines are excellent and the overall attention to detail is really impeccable. I felt really great to be able to have driven the Saabs that I have driven in my time and hope that one day I can own my own Saab and pass it on to my kids. The company that started the turbo craze and the safety fetish will always be one of the best and will be missed.

Devon M

Monday, February 25, 2013

CATCH!: 2013 Early Pre-Rankings--SS

There's no doubting his ability, but can Tulo stay healthy for a full season?
(photo courtesy of Mike McCann's Field of Fotos)

Felipe M

GREEN=Currently on my keeper team. 


1. Troy Tulowitzki: His ability is never in question; it's his health that seems to be a problem.  Projected OPS alone puts him way ahead of everybody else at the position.
2. Ben Zobrist: Just like in our 2B list, Zobrist's projections and position versatility are too good to pass up and ignore for 2013.
3. Jose Reyes: New team, new league; it will be interesting to see how Reyes responds to a totally new environment.  High contact rate, respectable on-base%, and stolen bases, presumably, will streamline very well. 
4. Starlin Castro: I'm really not sold on Castro, but his career numbers at this stage of his career seem to be comparable to some pretty good, Hall of Famers when they were Castro's age (22).  However, he needs to improve on his plate discipline and petty, in-game distractions on defense, but youth is definitely on his side.
5. Hanley Ramirez: What a miserable year it must have been to be a Hanley owner. He can still be a 20-20 player and he's projected to improve his plate discipline, but it's hard for me to take a risk on a guy who might be more of a headache than he's worth.


6. Ian Desmond: Came on strong late in 2012 as he was more aggressive at the plate.  Nevertheless, I find it hard to imagine him repeating Slash Lines of .292/.335/.511 with a terrible batting approach.  However, he's still projected to be a 20/20 player.
7. Jimmy Rollins: J-Roll is approaching that time in a player's career where diminished skills are too hard to overcome.  An impressive contact rate was his saving grace as it helped him hit 23 HRs and garner 30 stolen bases, but a paltry OPS of .743 is not going to cut it.  He needs to turn that contact rate into a higher batting average to help out Roto owners, but his projected low OPS for 2013 might hurt head2head owners.
8. Elvis Andrus: Decent contact rate and patience at the plate is how Andrus generates his most important attribute in fantasy: the ability to steal bases.  That combination also helps with batting average.
9. Erick Aybar: Never thought I would see the day that Aybar would make a top 10 in anything, but here we are.  Aybar has proven to be somewhat of a tough out and that's basically how he gets on base. Might hit 10 homeruns and is good for 25 stolen bases and his ability to make contact with the ball will help with batting average.
10. Asdrubal Cabrera: If "defensive wizardry" was aggregated in fantasy leagues, Cabrera's stock would be rising on this list.  However, it's an offensive-minded game. He brings 15/15 potential and a respectable on-base%. He does strikeout a lot so if you're in a head2head league that takes away points for that stat, you might want to look elsewhere for a more stable alternative.
11. Alcides Escobar: A recurring theme with shortstops, Escobar comes with a decent contact rate.  However, unlike the last few players listed, Escobar is very impatient at the plate.  Escobar comes with 30 steals potential and that's why he's on a lot of publications' top 15 list, but I, personally, would look elsewhere to fill out the position.
12. Marco Scutaro: There's that man again!  We explained Scutaro's 2013 outlook in our 2B projections.  Basically, impressive contact rate and patience, but advanced age is a factor.
13. Derek Jeter: Speaking of age: Jeter should be ready to go for 2013, barring more grotesque injuries.  Just like Scutaro, Jeter is an age risk (39). Good contact rate, impressive on-base numbers, and ability to hit for a high average make him an attractive choice in fantasy, but power has been pretty much sapped out of him and stolen bases are declining.  He's still a 10/10 player.  


The rest of the field: 
  • Danny Espinosa (if he were more patient at the plate, he would definitely be a higher ranked middle infielder).
  • J.J. Hardy
  • Alexei Ramirez
  • Andrelton Simmons
  • Everth Cabrera
  • Jed Lowrie (talk about your deep sleepers)
Keep an eye on: