What's On

Showing posts with label short-drive. Show all posts
Showing posts with label short-drive. Show all posts

Friday, January 6, 2023

We drive a (UK-spec) Land Rover Velar


Range Rover Velar.jpg
The name Velar isn’t the result of drunken scrabble, but a name that holds history with Land Rover. A name so prestige should have a prestigious vehicle behind it.

We feel a bit daring when we say this but Land Rover has been on a bit of a design revolution as of recent. The newly redesigned Disco looks amazing and now we have the Velar which is stunning. Audi, BMW and Mercedes won’t be sleeping well at night.

The UK market gets a choice of three diesels and two petrol engines. The entry-level 2-liter turbo-diesel pumps out 180hp (and is the same diesel engine sold in the U.S.) and a more powerful 240hp is available. Top of the range for the diesel engines is a 3-liter turbo-diesel six-cylinder pumping out 300hp. The petrol engines are limited to a 2-liter turbo four-cylinder pumping out 250hp and a 3-liter supercharged six-cylinder with a choice of 300hp or 380hp. Our tester car was the 2-liter turbo-diesel in 240hp (D240) in standard Velar trim.

It’s a bit strange that Land Rover doesn’t offer the more powerful 2-liter turbo-diesel here in the U.S. because this engine feels far more flexible and smoother than the 180hp form that we get; to be fair it’s great we get a diesel engine period. What we love the most about the more powerful 2-liter engine is that it doesn’t feel sluggish to respond and the added torque gives you more pull where it matters the most. However, the running costs do take a slight hit with the more horsepower but why would anyone buying a Land Rover care about that? Well, we certainly did because fuel prices in the UK are pretty high and it made us miss having the lower output even more. Driving on the right side of the road takes an abundance of getting used to; but we adjusted quickly as we were very eager to enjoy as much time behind the wheel of the Velar as possible.

On the road the Velar feels very comfortable to drive and doesn’t feel lofty around the corners and bends like you’d think most 4x4s would. It doesn’t feel as sharp to drive as a Porsche Cayenne but it certainly isn’t far from it. Wind and road noise are well suppressed thanks to a well-insulated cabin and the diesel engines makes all the right noises when you accelerate hard, but remain hushed at city speeds and cruising speeds on the highway. Steering feedback is where it should be and doesn’t feel heavy and clumsy when driving around town; however some tiny roundabouts make the Velar feel cumbersome at times.

The driving position is spot on good with a commanding view of the road ahead. The seats offer plenty of comfort and adjustability. The second row seats are decent in space, but you’d think there would be more legroom. The transmission tunnel makes life for the middleman very compromised. The boot space is generous too, now on to the infotainment system. The double screens add such class to the Velar that other Land Rovers don’t really have. It’s nicely positioned and you can adjust the first screen to angle to your preference. It’s quite lovely the whole design, but functionality is still questionable as the two separate screens can be quite distracting while on the move. We are starting to understand more and more why forward collision waring with full brake is being pushed for standard kit as these new infotainment systems are quite distracting and can potentially lead to a possible fatal crash if the driver isn’t paying attention to what they are doing! We found ourselves often playing it safe and just pulling to the side of the road to adjust certain controls such as the climate control and setting the Navigation system to find a location.

You can choose between three trims; Velar, R-Dynamic and First Edition. The First Edition comes with every option ticked as standard. We had the standard Velar trim which came with plenty of kit standard. LED headlights, autonomous emergency braking, lane departure warning and low traction launch system. Also fitted standard is 18-inch alloy wheels, heated door mirrors with auto-folding mirrors and intrusion sensors to protect your vehicle against theft. What we found a bit odd though is the boot didn’t have a hands-free open/close and the standard alloy wheels look tiny compared to the larger more premium alloys that are available as an option.

The Velar certainly is the best looking Land Rover hands down and even in this segment. The interior is classy and well designed, however you can’t ignore the iffy infotainment system which does get annoying at times and also the fact that some key features are optional instead of standard. Again, this isn’t the U.S. spec version of the Velar it’s the UK spec. We did enjoy our time with the Velar and how fun it is to drive. It is worth noting though that the standard version may appeal to those who are looking for cheapest way into a Land Rover but should keep in mind that it’s worth paying the extra for the R-Dynamic.

Likes: The diesel (D240) had strong pull and decent running costs. It has such a classy look inside out. Dare we say the best looking in this segment?

Dislikes: Typical Land Rover infotainment system nightmare, the electronic door handles are cool but are annoying at times.

[US-Spec versions tested]

P250 *** (We pick the P250 simply because it offers decent flexibility and running costs. However, most buyers choosing a Land Rover in general won't care too much about running costs at all. But if you do want a nice compromise this is the way to go.)

D180 **** (We love that Land Rover has finally offered a diesel engine here in the US. Some may argue that it really isn't needed since most Land Rover Buyers don't really care about running costs. However, we found it to be more than enough thanks to high torque at low revs. It may not be the most refined diesel on the block, but it does give you style and very low running costs for the class.)

P380 ** (Most Land Rover buyers will choose this engine as it's the quickest of the range. However, quicker sometimes doesn't mean better.)

Overall: The dual infotainment screens are prone to finger prints and require a learning curve to navigate through them. Also, they can be quite distracting while on the go. The Velar in general is a stylish vehicle, however it feels like it's all style and no real substance.

Monday, July 9, 2018

We test drive new cars (and of course) we critique



Hyundai Tucson

Likes: Standard kit list across the range is pretty impressive. The 1.6 turbo offers quick acceleration while the 2-liter is the most sensible in price. Plenty of room for five with a decently sized boot.

Dislikes: The front seats can get uncomfortable after long journeys. The turbo engine only comes with a DCT gearbox which isn't very refined compared to it's keen rivals.

Overall: It may not be the best out there but it certainly does make a winning case for itself.

2017 Toyota C-HR Excel HEV CVT 1.8.jpg

Toyota CH-R

Likes: Dare we say the most stylish Toyota we've seen in a while. Standard kit is pretty good for the price. Running costs are very competitive.

Dislikes: No all-wheel-drive option yet. The rear passenger windows are a joke. Blind spot galore. It really needs a panorama sunroof to brighten the interior up.

Overall: Toyota has made a very daring looking crossover that also has bullet proof reliability.

2018 BMW X1 xDrive18D Sport 2.0.jpg

BMW X1

Likes: It's more comfortable and more refined than the previous generation. The new turbo engine offers plenty of flexibility and the boot space is larger than it's keen rivals.

Dislikes: We miss the turbocharged six-cylinder option. We wish BMW made an M-tuned version of this. Options send the price into X3 territory.

Overall: It's a BMW but doesn't really feel like one.

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Genf 2018.jpg

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Likes: One of the more stylish crossovers in Mitsubishi range. Turbo engine spools nicely and has decent running costs. It's much more entertaining to drive than we'd originally thought.

Dislikes: It carries a name that many will loathe it for.

Overall: We'd love to see an Evo-tuned version pushing 230 - 300hp.



Subaru Crosstrek

Likes: It's off-road capability can rival Land Rover. It's much more stylish than the previous generation and also less awkward looking in portions.

Dislikes: Subaru has given up on turbo engines and it saddens us.

Overall: The JDM versions of this vehicle has power-folding mirrors and other features we can't have here.



Sunday, July 1, 2018

Short-drive with the Kia Optima

V09563P006.jpg

You’ll be surprised that not everyone wants a Toyota Camry or Honda Accord, and for those buyers there’s a sea of options out there. Where the Kia Optima stands, it all depends upon the depths of your wallet because if you’re willing to put your money where your mouth is. The Optima is a fine choice in a sea of bland. 



The standard 2.4 seems flexible enough and will be the mainstream engine choice for most buyers. We reckon that it’s worth spending the extra for the 1.6 turbo as it has more low-end torque for better highway acceleration and slightly lower running costs. You won’t see too many of them out there but the 2-liter turbo in the top of the range is best avoided if you looking at it from a sporting aspect. The engine itself isn’t bad, but it just feels disappointing when compared to the likes the Honda Accord V6 and Ford Fusion.

You won’t be too disappointed with the way the Kia Optima feels on the road. The steering feedback isn’t as sharp as a Mazda 6 and it certainly won’t win any bragging points like the Mazda either when it comes to driving dynamics. What it does offer is a smooth and competent ride that most people will be quite happy with and if you are feeling spirited, the handling is more on the secure side which won’t encourage you to push through corners and bends but at least it will keep you planted on all four-wheels and for majority of buyers in this segment that’s enough. Despite not being as engaging to drive as a Mazda, the Kia Optima is quite easy to drive around town. Steering feedback is enough for driving through narrow city streets and parking in tight parking spaces. Driving on the highway like a non-hooligan really does showcase how refined the Optima really is, there’s far less wind and road noise than we expected and the engine does spool well. We certainly wished our tester car came with the 1.6 turbo, but the 2.4 did the job well and despite having the most horsepower it still didn’t quite feel as peppy as the 1.6 turbo though.

The interior layout is pretty straight forward. The infotainment screen can get a little distracting while on the go, but it’s interface isn’t as confusing as some of its keen rivals. What we love the most about the Optima is the luxury features that you get standard. The driver’s seat moves back slightly to allow easy exiting and the wing mirrors fold in when you lock the vehicle; also there’s LED headlights and ventilated leather seats that really do come handy on those hot summer days. The rear seat offers ample space for two, three will be pushing it slightly due to the large transmission tunnel and the boot space while it isn’t as practical as a wagon or hatchback, it is decently shaped and sized for most people’s needs.

Our tester car (EX) came fitted with panoramic sunroof with power sunshade; 10-way power adjustable front seats with ventilated leather seats, auto-dimming rearview mirror and LED interior lighting. Autonomous emergency braking, smart cruise control, lane departure warning and premium sound system were also fitted with our Optima. We understand some options being optional for a reason but emergency braking is standard on all Toyota vehicles and should be standard here as well.

You won’t find too much excitement with the Kia Optima but it certainly does have a winning case for itself. It offers tons of value for the money and is an option that’s worthy of the shortlist if you are considering the Toyota Camry or Honda Accord. However, you’ll have to stick with the cheaper of the range to get the best value, and while our tester car had all the bells and whistles that we liked. We still find it hard to pay the premium for one when there are many other options that are slightly better in quality and hold their value much better.

Likes: 1.6 turbo offers good flexibility and low running costs. The standard kit list is high and the asking price is reasonable, plus it’s spacious for five with a decent boot to match.

Dislikes: The 1.6 turbo is limited to one trim. We’d love to see the wagon here; also the top of the range 2-liter turbo is disappointing to drive.

Our pick: We’d stick with the trim (EX) that we had as our tester car. It came fitted with all the options we’d like to see without having to pay an arm and leg for it. We just wish that it were as exciting to drive as the Mazda 6.

Wednesday, June 20, 2018

Short-drive (of course we critique) new cars

2015 Dodge Charger SRT 392 with Scat Pack.JPG

Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat

Likes: The cheapest 707hp sedan one can buy. The engine exhaust note something that the devil himself put together. Acceleration that will shame almost everything on the road.

Dislikes: Interior build quality is iffy. We couldn't drive it like we wanted and it begged us to push it harder.

Overall: It's high performance in the rawest since of the word.



Dodge Challenger Hellcat Demon

Likes: It takes performance to the next level. The exhaust note is something only the devil himself would put together. Jaw dropping price of admission.

Dislikes: It only comes with one seat (driver's seat) and the rest are optional. Some may find it very hard to drive it non-aggressively.

Overall: A Challenger that's been demon-possessed.



Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk

Likes: The option for those who wanted a Charger Hellcat but need all-wheel-drive. It's pure insanity how quick this SUV is.

Dislikes: The temptation to drive this like a hooligan is way too much even for us to handle.

Overall: It's all about getting their in the quickest and loudest way possible.



Dodge Durango SRT

Likes: The eight-cylinder engine, acceleration and exhaust note comes from Satan himself. It can seat up to seven people.

Dislikes: It guzzles gas like it's going out of style.

Overall: It a seven-seat muscle car, the way Satan himself intended it to be.

Ram 1500 Genf 2018.jpg

Ram 1500

Likes: 'In your face' exterior styling. Engines that sound beefy even when driving casually. It's big and offensive and will probably sell in droves. Available 12-inch infotainment screen.

Dislikes: It can be cumbersome to drive around town. Don't ask about the fuel bills. Build quality that is still questionable.

Overall: The only pick-up that made us question if we need a pick-up.

Friday, June 8, 2018

We take a short-drive in a few cars

2018 Jaguar E-Pace HSE Diesel Automatic 2.0.jpg

Jaguar E-Pace

Likes: Dynamically it's more engaging to drive than many of it's keen rivals. Both turbo engines offer decent flexibility and decent running costs.

Dislikes: This should've been called the 'I-Pace' instead of the 'E-Pace'.

Overall: We worry that the E-Pace will suffer the same reliability woes as the Evoque, seeing they share the same platform.



Audi A4 Allroad

Likes: It's the closest thing to an A4 Avant we can get. It's stylish inside out with running costs that are respectable. Dynamically this is generation A4 is the best of the best.

Dislikes: Audi infotainment screen looks stunning but it's quite confusing to navigate. Despite the raised ground clearance, it can't really handle go far off-road.

Overall: It looks more like a 'wagon' than crossover but we still love it.

Lincoln Navigator P4220641.jpg

Lincoln Navigator

Likes: This might be the most handsome Navigator we've seen so far. The interior is a major step forward for Lincoln. Proof that turbo six-cylinders can handle an eight-cylinder engine job.

Dislikes: It's cumbersome to drive around town. Running costs are as steep as the price of admission. Some trim levels the price becomes jaw dropping expensive.

Overall: It's got the 'bling-bling' appeal but the Mercedes GLS is so much better.

Nissan Kicks 01 China 2018-03-20.jpg

Nissan Kicks

Likes: Starting price is low. Running costs are low and standard kit is high. It's roomy for five and quite comfortable and easy to live with as a daily commuter car.

Dislikes: It neither 'kicks' in acceleration or handling. The Juke was more fun to drive and more distinctive in looks.

Overall: Proof that people prefer 'boring' crossovers over exciting and just as efficient hatchbacks and wagons.



Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid

Likes: It's a proper MPV (multi-purpose vehicle). It's not a sluggish hybrid, even though most will drive it for the intended purpose of saving an extra few bucks in ferrying the family around.

Dislikes: What's going on at Chrysler? It's a bit steep in the pricing compared to non-hybrid rivals.

Overall: The most proper MPV you can buy without having to choose Honda or Toyota.


Friday, April 20, 2018

Land Rover (short-drive) which one should we buy?


We're looking to replace our Mitsubishi Outlander Sport with something a bit more posh. The Land Rover Evoque we had wasn't the most reliable but it certainly wasn't that bad to own either. However, we do want to give Land Rover another go. The new Velar and Discovery are two strong considerations.

Land Rover Discovery Sport HSE Luxury TD4 2016.jpg

Land Rover Discovery Sport

Likes: It still lives up to Land Rover reputation for off-road capabilities. There's finally a more powerful engine option. Unique 5+2 seating configuration.

Dislikes: The auto gearbox often doesn't feel on the same page as the engine. We certainly wish there was a diesel engine option. Reliability is still iffy.

Overall: It's Land Rover's best selling model here for good reason.

2017 Land Rover Range Rover Velar First Edition D3 3.0 Front.jpg

Land Rover Velar

Likes: The most stylish Land Rover of the range. The interior is stunning to look at with very cool digital displays.

Dislikes: Finicky door handles and infotainment displays.

Overall: It's a home run from Land Rover.



Land Rover Evoque

Likes: A baby Land Rover that's still fully capable off-road. The convertible version is an oddball but we love it. More powerful engine option available.

Dislikes: The convertible is a bit pointless. Rear seat space is on the cramped side.

Overall: The Disco Sport is roomier and cheaper but a convertible SUV makes it even more intriguing.

2017 Land Rover Discovery HSE TD6 Automatic (01).jpg

Land Rover Discovery

Likes: It seats up to seven people. The electric folding seats are pretty cool. The diesel engine has the lowest running costs.

Dislikes: Reliability short-term and long-term still remain iffy.

Overall: It's quite literally our favorite Land Rover of the range.